Tuesday, October 2, 2007

CDHP: Shifting the Power of Healthcare Management to the Consumer

Would you like to manage your own healthcare? Now you can with a consumer-driven health plan (CDHP). This type of health insurance is increasing in popularity with a growing number of companies offering it every year and an estimated 3.8 million employees already enrolled (See image to the right). CDH plans allow people to participate in their healthcare expenditures by paying lower monthly premium contributions in exchange for higher deductibles and out-of- pocket maximums. Employees are provided with a supplemental healthcare plan and are responsible for managing their own healthcare expenses such as coinsurance and co-pay fees with one of two accounts; health reimbursement account (HRA) or health savings account (HSA). HRA is an account “owned and funded by the employer” while HSA is “owned by the employee and are funded either by the employee or with contributions from the employer”. With either of these accounts, CDH plans have provided a way for employers to reduce healthcare costs, and put more power in the hands of consumers.

With CDH plans, employers will no longer have to contribute to high premiums like those necessary for traditional HMO and PPO health care plans. According to a survey done by Mercer Human Resource Consulting, a higher deductible “reduces the employer’s share of annual premiums down to an average of $5,770 a person, about $1,000 lower than for other plans”. In addition, these plans allow consumers to purchase their healthcare on a need basis, and therefore eliminating what economists would identify as a possibility for moral hazard. Consumers would be able to reduce their costs by paying for healthcare that is suitable just for them.

The CDHP seems like a win-win situation.

Nevertheless, despite these arguments in favor of this plan, CDHP consumers’ survey results show that “44% are not likely to recommend them to others, compared to 19% of those with traditional health plans; 37% are not likely to stay with their plan if given another option (13% for those with traditional plans); and only 37% are very or extremely satisfied, against 67% of the folks with traditional plans”. It is evident that there are still many issues that need to be resolved for the future success of this novice plan design. Although CDH plans provide benefits to both the employers and employees, both groups must be wary of the potential downfalls of the plan design including high out-of-pocket maximums and minimal insurance coverage.

To reduce monthly premium contributions in CDH plans, out-of-pocket costs are increased in order to shift the liability of future health risks to the consumers. However, these out-of-pocket costs must be reasonable for a consumer and their family to afford. One problem, especially with the health savings account (HSA), is that employers can choose not to contribute to the account and leave it to the employee to manage and pay for their own deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums. This can cause a huge financial burden on employees’ with unexpected healthcare costs. In order for this health care plan to work, employer’s need to ensure that employee’s will not be abandoned in midst of a medical crisis.

Many individuals are skeptical about the CDH plan offerings because of the broad range of insurance coverage the plans offer. In a New York Times Article, Fran Hawthorne states, “one way to pay less is to cover less”. Many CDH plans will not provide well-rounded medical benefits including a combination of preventative, routine, and hospitalization coverage so that they can reduce costs. Without any aid from the insurance company, the costs for these office visits and procedures could strongly deter consumers from getting the healthcare that they need. This could potentially lead to even greater health risks and problems in the future. With the strong evidence and support for preventative care and early detection in today’s health care system, CDH plans must encourage employees to get the proper medical care in a timely fashion before their condition becomes life threatening and the cost of medical care is unaffordable.

The CDH plan proposes a new strategy for reducing healthcare expenses, which is desperately needed in light of today’s rising costs. Currently, the United States spends on average $5,283 per person a year for healthcare. CDH plans have the potential to help reduce the per capita cost for healthcare by lowering premiums and reducing unnecessary insurance coverage, but employers and employees must become active participants in their healthcare expenditures (Illustration of a CDHP advertisement can be seen on the left). Employers need to have a good understanding of the medical coverage that their employees need in order to provide comprehensive benefits that will reduce large claim liabilities; and employees must learn how to safely and properly budget their healthcare expenses to reduce their costs. In order to help ensure that this occurs, regulations should be imposed to guarantee coverage of preventative care services and greater price transparency by healthcare providers so that employers and employees can better understand the nature and costs of healthcare. In order for healthcare to progress, everyone needs to have a better understanding of how their medical insurance works so that can use it in a more efficient and effective manner.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

How would you explain that only 19% of consumers choose CDH when they actually have a choice, or the tepid increase in CDH and HSA members, or that over 50% of HSA have 0 dollars in them. Look broader.

Anonymous said...

GA- Your post is overall very insightful and interesting and I truly enjoyed reading it. Health care is currently a very prominent issue, especially at the forefront of our upcoming election. Further, I definitely agree that “in order for health care to progress, everyone needs to have a better understanding of how medical insurance works so that [individuals] can use it more efficient and effective manner.” This seems essential and evident, as many employees are given health care policies, though left in the dark when it comes to the exact ramifications of such plans concerning their own share in covering their medical expenses. Thus, although it may appear to be a “win-win situation,” particularly with the data showing employers that their health care payouts can be cut by as much as $1000 per person, consumer driven health (CDH) seems to greatly favor the bank versus an employee’s health. As you stated and with which I fully agree, “it is evident that there are still many issues that need to be resolved for the future success of this novice plan design” particularly concerning the financial burden placed on each employee with such a ‘your-health care-in-your-hands’ type of policy. I can see how this plan would lower an insurance companies “moral hazard” as patients would likely limit their health care use to essential visits because they have to cover their own, likely substantial, premiums. Based on the helpful description and discussion of CDH you offered, I am not surprised with the figures showing that only “37% [CDH holders] are very or extremely satisfied, against 67% of the folks with traditional plans.” I would love to hear more of your opinion concerning this policy issue, particularly concerning whether or not you think it is even worth salvaging or should be replaced by some form of universal health care. I feel this new type of plan plays to the side of the employer by reducing their “overhead” costs at the great expense and well-being of the employee, signaling modification is definitely necessary.

GA said...

Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on my blog healthpundit. Your comment brings up some interesting points regarding CDH plans, which I would like to respond to. In regards to “only 19% of consumers” choosing CDH plans, I would think due to the novelty and uniqueness of this insurance plan design, it will take consumers some time to learn about the benefits of using a CDH plan. Change can be very daunting especially when it puts a greater responsibility on consumers’ shoulders, like the CDH plan does. The insurance plan has only been in existence for a few years now, but the trend is that it is becoming more popular, which is a good sign of its success. (Please refer to bar chart in my blog). Nevertheless, I do agree with you that this plan is far from perfect. I think with some time and policy regulations, the CDH plan can get employees and employers more involved with their healthcare leading to more customized care and reduced costs.

This brings me to your second point regarding the fact that “over 50% of HSA accounts have 0 dollars in them”. This is very disappointing number for me to see. May I ask where you found this statistic? According to an article in CNN (http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/prnewswire/AQW12312092007-1.htm), “Of the employers offering an HSA, 67 percent contribute either a flat dollar amount of less than $500 per person (17 percent), $500 or more (40 percent) or match employee contributions (10 percent). ” The results of this report show that over half of the companies do contribute to their employees’ health savings account (HSA). Nonetheless, you still bring up a good point about what should we do for employees that receive an HSA account with “0 dollars in them”. We must keep in mind that employees are saving on monthly premiums and are able to put money into their HSA without any taxes. Employer contributions may not even be necessary if employees have a reasonable deductible and out-of-pocket maximum. With a decreasing number of businesses even offering health insurance coverage to their employees, I think the CDH plan can provide a successful lower cost option for employer’s to offer to their employees (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119084989428640656.html).

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.